Why it fits
- Your app is already Phoenix + Ecto centered.
- You want search sync to be explicit and observable.
- You want a library, not a platform.
- You want the operator story to be honest.
Evaluate fit
The honest answer is: use it if you want search indexing to feel native to Ecto and you care about knowing when search is current, queued, or stale. Do not use it if you want a hosted search platform or a framework facade that hides the work.
Good fit
Not a fit
Scrypath is not a SaaS search product. It is the orchestration layer around your own search backend.
If you want hidden hooks that imply search is always current, the library is deliberately the wrong shape.
v1 targets Meilisearch first and keeps the adapter seam internal. That is a product choice, not a missing feature.
Tradeoffs
You do not need to infer state from a giant callback maze, and you do not need to treat the web layer as the boundary. The contexts stay in charge.
Your app owns Meilisearch deployment, keys, backups, capacity, recovery decisions, and what is visible when. Scrypath makes that explicit instead of pretending otherwise.
Read the Meilisearch modelScope and reopen
Reopen requests route through policy and evidence, not preference. The triggers are: concrete production bug, reviewed outside-adopter evidence, and deliberate strategic product decision.
Keep the website short and use the policy guide for full scope authority.
Scope and reopen policyDecision rule
It fits when records live in Ecto and your team wants explicit sync, observable drift, and recovery tools without building that layer from scratch.